Background for the header
To the home page of the University of Antwerp

 

 

LORE / Publications

 

TitleEvaluating Clone Detection Techniques from a Refactoring Perspective
Author(s)Filip Van Rysselberghe and Serge Demeyer
Download N/A
Links
AbstractIn the last decade, several researchers have investigated techniques to automatically detect duplicated code in programs exceeding hundreds of thousands lines of code. All of these techniques have known merits and deficiencies, but as of today, little is known on how these techniques fit into the refactoring process of object-oriented systems. This paper compares three representative detection techniques (simple line matching, parameterized matching, and metric fingerprints) by means of five small to medium sized cases and analyses the differences between the reported matches. Based on this comparison, we conclude that (1) simple line matching is best suited for a partial, yet advanced restructuring with little effort; (2) metric fingerprints work best for refactoring a system with minimal effort; (3) parameterized matching demands more effort yet allows a more profound, less obvious restructuring of the code.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{VanRysselberghe04Evaluating,
	author = {Filip Van Rysselberghe and Serge Demeyer},
	title = {Evaluating Clone Detection Techniques from a Refactoring  
Perspective},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Software Engineering},
	year = {2004},
	note = {}
}
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

 Lab On REengineering - Antwerpen, last modified 12:35:26 17 August 2010