Background for the header
To the home page of the University of Antwerp

 

 

LORE / Publications

 

TitleA Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions
Author(s)Bart Du Bois, Christian F. J. Lange, Serge Demeyer and Michel R. V. Chaudron
Download [PDF]
Links
AbstractAnalogue to the more familiar notion of coding conventions, modeling conventions attempt to ensure uniformity and prevent common modeling defects. While it has been shown that modeling conventions can decrease defect density, it is currently unclear whether this decreased de- fect density results in higher model quality, i.e., whether models created with modeling conventions exhibit higher fitness for purpose. In a controlled experiment1 with 27 master-level computer science students, we evaluated quality differences between UML analysis and design models created with and without modeling conventions. We were unable to discern significant differences w.r.t. the clarity, completeness and validity of the information the model is meant to represent. We interpret our findings as an indication that modeling conventions should guide the analyst in identifying what information to model, as well as how to model it
BibTeX
@inproceedings{DuBois_QIM2006,
	author = {Bart Du Bois, Christian F. J. Lange, Serge Demeyer and Michel R. V. Chaudron},
	title = {A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions},
	booktitle = {Models in Software Engineering, Workshops and Symposia at MoDELS 2006},
	editor = {Thomas Kuhne},
	pages = {91-100},
	publisher = {Springer},
	year = {2007},
	note = {}
}
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

 Lab On REengineering - Antwerpen, last modified 12:35:26 17 August 2010